Unlike a public advertisement, which simply provides information and leaves the recipient free to act upon it or not, in person solicitation may exert pressure and often demands an immediate response, without providing an opportunity for comparison or reflection. The aim and effect of in person solicitation may be to provide a one sided presentation and to encourage speedy and perhaps uninformed decisionmaking; there is no opportunity for intervention or counter education by agencies of the Bar, supervisory authorities, or persons close to the solicited individual….
The substantive evils of solicitation have been stated over the years in sweeping terms: stirring up litigation, assertion of fraudulent claims, debasing the legal profession, and potential harm to the solicited client in the form of overreaching, overcharging, underrepresentation, and misrepresentation….
The Rules prohibiting solicitation are prophylactic measures whose objective is the prevention of harm before it occurs. The Rules were applied in this case to discipline a lawyer for soliciting employment for pecuniary gain under circumstances likely to result in the adverse consequences the State seeks to avert. In such a situation, which is inherently conducive to overreaching and other forms of misconduct, the State has a strong interest in adopting and enforcing rules of conduct designed to protect the public from harmful solicitation by lawyers whom it has licensed.
The State’s perception of the potential for harm in circumstances such as those presented in this case is well founded. The detrimental aspects of face-to-face selling even of ordinary consumer products have been recognized and addressed by the Federal Trade Commission, and it hardly need be said that the potential for overreaching is significantly greater when a lawyer, a professional trained in the art of persuasion, personally solicits an unsophisticated, injured, or distressed lay person. Such an individual may place his trust in a lawyer, regardless of the latter’s qualifications or the individual’s actual need for legal representation, simply in response to persuasion under circumstances conducive to uninformed acquiescence. Although it is argued that personal solicitation is valuable because it may apprise a victim of misfortune of his legal rights, the very plight of that person not only makes him more vulnerable to influence but also may make advice all the more intrusive. Thus, under these adverse conditions the overtures of an uninvited lawyer may distress the solicited individual simply because of their obtrusiveness and the invasion of the individual’s privacy, even when no other harm materializes. Under such circumstances, it is not unreasonable for the State to presume that in-person solicitation by lawyers more often than not will be injurious to the person solicited.
- A famous celebrity endorsed a lawyer, but does that mean this is a superior lawyer?
- What should you look for in an attorney?
- What are the lawyer ratings provided for by Martindale-Hubbell?
- Where does a person go to find a lawyer?
- What is continuing legal education?
- If a lawyer passes a state bar exam can he or she then practice in any state?
- Do all states require individuals to take a bar exam to practice law?
- What is tested on the bar exam?
- How many bar exams are there?
- What can disqualify a person from sitting for a bar exam?
- If a person passes the bar exam, is he or she automatically entitled to practice law?
- Can all law school graduates take the bar exam?
- What is the American Bar Association?
- What does it take to become a lawyer?
- Do many states have family courts?
- What is the relationship between state high courts and state constitutions?
- Are all state court systems based on the three-tiered model of trial court, intermediate appellate court, and final appellate court?
- Do all state high courts have the same number of justices or judges?
- Are all state high courts called supreme courts?
- Which states do not have elections for any type of judges?